<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Journalism on Sasha Katsnelson</title><link>https://katsnelson.org/tags/journalism/</link><description>Recent content in Journalism on Sasha Katsnelson</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://katsnelson.org/tags/journalism/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Abandoned and Set Adrift</title><link>https://katsnelson.org/blog/abandoned-and-adrift/</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://katsnelson.org/blog/abandoned-and-adrift/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thinking is really hard. After a long day of work and then expending energy maintaining relationships, my body, and my home - I don&amp;rsquo;t always have much left to do the research necessary to form sensible, well-informed opinions about topics that I feel are important.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Health-care, police violence, taxation, welfare, immigration, and the list goes on - I have intuitions about the effects of various policies based on what I have read in the moments of distraction between things I should be doing - but I know that those are informed by my &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filter_bubble"&gt;filter bubble&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Annoying Journalism</title><link>https://katsnelson.org/blog/annoying-journalism/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://katsnelson.org/blog/annoying-journalism/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/how-much-money-doctors-make-2017-4"&gt;Here&amp;rsquo;s how much money doctors actually make&lt;/a&gt; - it’s a catchy headline, but it summarizes a single article and then passes it off as research&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t mean to pick on Business Insider in particular, but this is a great example of the kind of journalism that I’ve found frustrating. BI has an annual article that pretends to analyze doctor salaries - &lt;a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/how-much-money-do-doctors-make-2016-4"&gt;2016&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/how-much-money-doctors-make-2017-4"&gt;2017&lt;/a&gt;. In 2017, it’s just pulling two charts from a single &lt;a href="http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/878129_5"&gt;Medscape article&lt;/a&gt; and then describing them&amp;hellip; there’s a lot of interesting content discoverable with a &lt;a href="https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&amp;amp;ion=1&amp;amp;espv=2&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8#q=racial+diversity+doctors+specialists&amp;amp;safe=off&amp;amp;tbs=qdr:y"&gt;google search&lt;/a&gt; or even a look at the Medscape references. The articles miss a ton of nuance, e.g., controlling for specialty, seniority, hours worked, and some other factors black male physicians earn 35% less than their white male counterparts, a significantly larger gap than the 13% the BI article indicates - but women don’t have a disparity in pay between black and white doctors (&lt;a href="http://www.bmj.com/content/353/bmj.i2923"&gt;more here&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>