<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Language on Sasha Katsnelson</title><link>https://katsnelson.org/categories/language/</link><description>Recent content in Language on Sasha Katsnelson</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://katsnelson.org/categories/language/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Etymology of Nuance</title><link>https://katsnelson.org/blog/etymology-nuance/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://katsnelson.org/blog/etymology-nuance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;rsquo;t know if it&amp;rsquo;s because I&amp;rsquo;m trained to think this way - but I carry with me the idea that adding description of a word or concept should lead to a sharper picture. More complicated concepts frequently require refinement to accurately define them. When I&amp;rsquo;m trying to describe a concept or situation that will require loads of additional description, I frequently rely on the word nuance (or in Spanish, matiz).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>